Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Essay Example
Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Essay Positive discrimination towards women in society is justified. No becauseâ⬠¦ Discrimination is never positive. In a civilized society, it is not exceptable to treat people differently, on the basis of gender. Furthermore, the claim of women having a disadvantaged status is preposterous. A quick examination of our laws and societal practices shows that women have an incredibly advantaged status. They are not required to register for the draft[1], like men are. They have a government council devoted solely to them[2] [3], whereas men do not. They have female-only scholarships and grants[4], whereas men do not. They have shelters to escape domestic violence[5], whereas men do not. They are protected from circumcision by law[6], whereas men are not. Their names are hidden when they accuse others of several kinds of crimes, whereas men are not[7]. If anyone is disadvantaged, its men. Men are 80% of suicides[8], 40% of colleges students[9], 40% of degree earners[10], 80% of the homeless[11], 80% of the layed off[12], and 92. 7% of the job deaths[13]. Men are more likely to die from every major cause of death[14], and yet there exists no amount of medical funding and research for them, on par with that of women. And this is to say nothing, of the blatant discriminations, under the law, that men suffer, as mentioned above. Positive discrimination towards women should not be allowed Women shouldnt be subject to positive discrimination because they are as capable as men are at succeeding in society. International law also states that men and women are both equal in right therefore positive discrimination is in direct breach of this. We will write a custom essay sample on Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Even given the best of intentions, discrimination based on ascribed rather than achieved characteristics is unjust Not true equalityâ⬠¦ If men and women are truly equal, there shouldnt be a need for a particular legislation to classify them as such. Laws are inherently complicated and the wording can be interpreted in a variety of ways. If we propose to legislate equality rights for women, that could have the negative effect of restricting the rights as lawyers examine the legislations finding alternate interpretations. Ending up in constricting rights that is already given in general laws applying equally to every man woman and child in this country. Positive discrimination serves little purpose, women shouldnt need a specific set of laws telling them what they can do, if they truly believe they are equal to men in every way. The basic laws such as Human Rights Act 1998 should be sufficient. Will Cause Resentment Between Men and Women Positive discrimination is seen as favouring one over the other, the other side will harbor resentments and jealousy. Women and men need to work together in society; and, they cant do so with such hostility between them. Such steps will engender a feeling of despair in men, when they are treated as less that of women. They will resent women, particularly for attempting to justify the discriminations against them. In no way, shape, and form could biases against men, contribute to a healthy society, nor will they mend any problems we have now. On the contrary, they would make relations between the genders far more problematic than they already are. As for your question, about my origins, Im from Mars, if youre from Venus. It does not address the underlying issues well actually if the women of today are given jobs on the basis of positive discrimination, their daughters(and sons) have greater motivation and probability for getting jobs. Working/educated mothers have better chances of educated/working children. Schools set up just to educate girls are a form of positive discrimination. Positive discrimination is merely a stop-gap measure. It only helps women in the end result ie getting a job it doesnt address why they might not be having the access to these opportunities in the first place. If women are not being offered jobs at the top end of industry, why not? If as in some countries it is because they do not have equal access to education, then addressing this base issue would have a more positive and long lasting effect. If women do not have access to jobs through discrimination reasons then discrimination legislation needs to be implemented or more strictly enforced. Positive discrimination may help the current generation of disadvantaged women but fails to address future generations issues. It is Men, Not Women, who are Disadvantaged in our Society The claim of women having a disadvantaged status is preposterous. A quick examination of our laws and societal practices shows that women have an incredibly advantaged status. They are not required to register for the draft[1], like men are. They have a government council devoted solely to them[2] [3], whereas men do not. They have female-only scholarships and grants[4], whereas men do not. They have shelters to escape domestic violence[5], whereas men do not. They are protected from circumcision by law[6], whereas men are not. Theyre names are hidden when they accuse others of several kinds of crimes, whereas men are not[7]. If anyone is disadvantaged, its men. Men are 80% of suicides[8], 40% of colleges students[9], 40% of degree earners, 80% of the homeless[10], 80% of the layed off[11], and 92. 7% of the job deaths[12]. Men are more likely to die from every major cause of death[13], and yet there exists no amount of medical funding and research for them, on par with that of women. And this is to say nothing, of the blatant discriminations, under the law, that men suffer, as mentioned above. Rebuttal to opposition, part 1: Not True Equality In the post, Not True Equality, you stated that: your premise is incorrect. All men and women should be treated equally. A woman keeping a man-slave for chattel does not make that slave inferior but if the law does not say that they are equal shell have the right to treat that man as an inferior and keep him as her slave; undermining him in everything. bullying people does not make someone superior, fact is more men bully women than vice versa and the law needs to state that the sexes are equal to diminish harassment from either side. It is your premise that is incorrect. You can not state that you think men and women should be treated equally, when you are arguing in favor of women being given special advantages in society. Secondly, the law does state that the sexes are equal; but, it isnt applied that way. For example, only men are required to register for the draft. If it is equality you seek, then the answer is just that: equalit y. Inequality can not be fixed by advocating for more inequality. Thirdly, where on earth did you get that men bully women, more often than vice-versa? You gave no citations; and, you need to add them. You outright claim its a fact; but, you go on to give no factual evidence. Furthermore, how is that relevant to the discussion at hand? Bullying has no barring on the subject of how the law should treat different groups. Rebuttal to opposition, part 2: Positive discrimination towards women should not be allowed In the post, Positive discrimination towards women should not be allowed, you stated: There is no such thing as international law in the USA, except for treaties which are ratified by the Senate. Consequently, the so-called international law must be subservient to USA law and interpreted accordingly. Thus, positive discrimination does NOT violate international law because international law does NOT exist in the USA. Women should certainly be granted positive discrimination, and men should give every advantage to them. Actually, there is such a thing as international law; and the ones we are talking about have already been agreed to by the United States Congress. It is not, nor must it be subservient to U. S. law. The United States signed the treaty known as the Charter of the United Nations[1]; wherein the United States agreed to be bound by its articles, including chapter IV, wherein the United States agreed to adhere to the resolutions of the General Assembly. One such resolution was the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[2], which stated in Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty One of the rights and freedoms set forth in the declaration, that was alluded to in the post, Positive discrimination towards women should not be allowed was the right to be equals before the law, as set out in Article 7, which states: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. The United States Congress has already signed this treaty and is therefore obliged to comply with it, at the legislative level. That is why positive discrimination against men is already in violation of our laws and international law; and, why it cant be permitted.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
Informative Speech Coconut Oil Essays
Informative Speech Coconut Oil Essays Informative Speech Coconut Oil Essay Informative Speech Coconut Oil Essay Essay Topic: Informative Intro Coconut oil had a bad reputation for a long time because of its high saturated fat content. Health experts have hammered into us that saturated fat is bad for your hear t health. According to the website, Gunners 201 3, Coconut oil contains a unique combo nation of fatty acids with powerful properties. The type of fat in coconut oil is called medium chain triglycerides, Which is a saturated fat that goes straight from your liver to you r digestive tract There it is used as a quick energy source and can even create ketene bodies which have a therapeutic effect on brain disorders such as epilepsy and alchemists accords Eng to Gunners 013. As far as health benefits goes,this seems pretty great right? Eat a little bi t of coconut oil,get a little bit of energy and fight off epilepsy and alchemies at the same it me. Well since it still has a high level of saturated its still not considered the best oil for your heart health. Another health benefit is a possibility of preventing infections. 2 char strictest of coconut oil make this possible. One, twelve carbon Laurie acids makes up alma cost 50% of fatty acids and Two, when it is digested it forms a monocotyledon called monolayer n. Both monocotyledon and immolation can kill harmful pathogens like bacteria,viruses tan fungi. This can be done of you take just coconut oil or if you just use it as a topical solution n as well. The last health benefit is weight loss! This benefit implements the Masts as well as the key tones from the benefits previously mentioned. According to Gunner 2013, 1 study f mound that 1530 grams of Masts per day increased 24 hour expenditure by 5%. Totaling about 120 calories per day. Stones have been shown to reduce your appetite. So increasing you r energy expenditure and decreasing your appetite equals weight loss. All thanks to co coconut Oil. So there you have it, quick energy source,brain disorder fighting stones,infection prevention,and weight loss. These are only a few of the many benefits of coconut oil. Now let s look at some of the ways we can use coconut oil. There are many resources online to find ways to use coconut oil. I have found one that has every use from all of the resources corn binned and then some. Wellnesss. Mom has a list of 101 uses for coconut oil and this where e first heard of the many uses from cooking,to personal hygiene, to baby care. Also on this w Bessie,including an addition to the 101 uses,there are comments from other users saying ha t they use their coconut oil for. So it is literally never ending. People are continually comments Eng on this page of what they use it for. Say I use my coconut oil for one thing while another us ere can say that they do the same thing but in a different way. So really its just endless in the different ways you can use coconut oil. Im going to discuss 3 of the many uses that I use my coconut oil for. First, I use to cook. I use it in everything from frying,to baking, you can even u SE it in pasta. You can use it in anything that you would use oil in your chokingly is ever hitting, you can use coconut oil. Its just going to have to go with your taste. Ive used it on my baby cousin before, she gets diaper rashes. All the chemicals in diapers and wipes can be very harsh on sensitive bottoms. Coconut oil is a great substitute for diaper cream because of the initiating properties. Also its obviously moisturizing. Finally I use it as an eye makeup re mover. It works like any other lotion but having the added benefits of the coconut oil makes it my #1 go to for any lotion applied to my skin. Again there are many more ways to use coconut oil.
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Apply structural andinstitutional explanationsof the behaviorof Essay
Apply structural andinstitutional explanationsof the behaviorof AustriaHungary until 1914 - Essay Example Austria was a quasi-independent state in the Middle Ages within the Holy Roman Empire. The Habsburgs inherited the crown of Hungary with part of the Kingdom preserved from the Ottomans. The Ottomans were driven out of Hungary in 1669. Austria and Hungary were a personal union from1526 to 1848 under the Habsburgs (Fromkin, pp.11-16). Taking into consideration the status of the Hungarian Kingdom before the revolution, it can be seen that the kingdom was formally part of the Empire of Austria. Based on the Article of the year nineteen seventy, it was stipulated that the regnum independence with a separate Monarchy. The Empire of Austria had never lawfully included the Kingdom of Hungary. The policy was consistent with both public and constitutional law as discussed. The government of the Hungary Kingdom could be in a position of preserving a separate and independent budget since the begging of the personal union from 1527.The Hungarian budget was after the revolution of 1848 to 1849. The budget was independent too. Despite all these, the Kingdom of Hungary maintained its customs borders. The borders separated the Hungarian Kingdom from the other parts of the Habsburg ruled territories. The union had made a consent/agreement customs union between the Austrian and Hungarian where they were to negotiate in every ten years. The contracts were also renewed and signed by Budapest and Vienna at the end of every ten years since both countries hoped to get mutual economic benefit from their relationship (Fromkin, pp.11-16). Austria-Hungary also declared war on Serbia on July twenty-eight in the year 1914. Austria-Hungary made a step further to mobilize for plan B against Belgrade. There was the need for the warring governments to defend and explain their decision, with the Germans publishing a first set of diplomatic papers in early August. The propaganda machinery of the government supported the decisions that
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)